Looks controversial on twitter so far.
I lowkey like the list.
Pau over IT is already blasphemy
I think for that he was going off advanced metrics which pau has a advantage on and Pau’s longevity is better so I could see the case.
The only thing that made MJ no.1 is rings. understandable ig, at least they acknowledged the stats
Kinda surprised when I saw Curry at #10 because it seemed a bit to early in his career to declare that.
Oh, so this is what we’re arguing about today.
I was too lol but he deserves it
That triggered me. DPOY as a shooting guard. 10 time scoring champ. Averaged 37 ppg in 1986. Cmon man, stop hating
Curry top 10 already and Kobe #14 is extremely accurate so I like the list
Whether you like it or not no one will ever surpass this. Lebron was the only chance, until he went 3/9 in the finals
I didn’t like the case he put out for MJ at #1. He focused a bit much on accolades.
MJ has a good case when it comes to advanced metrics too which he used throughout the article.
I didn’t get Robinson over hakeem
They violated AI
Russ not close to top 15 and behind Nash / cp3 - Check
Kobe not top 10 - Check
Jordan #1 - Check
Looks good to me
Kawhi is obviously better than 42 tho. So i guess theyre just basing it on career stats but whatever
Kawhi hasn’t played elite for long enough. It will improve over time the longer he plays.
Most people were saying he’s not top 50 I said he’s top 25/35
And Elgin Baylor avg 38 in 1962
Averaging 38 in 1962 is meaningless compared to averaging 37 in the Bird/Magic era
barely have any issues with this list except Wilt at 9 is tough.